Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC 2002 01953 3
Original file (BC 2002 01953 3.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
SECOND
ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	
		DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2002-01953-3
		COUNSEL: NONE
		HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Similar appeals were considered and denied by the Board on 
5 February 2002 and 24 November 2009.  For an accounting of the 
facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s appeal and 
the rationale of the earlier decisions by the Board, see Exhibit 
E and G, respectively.

In a letter to the Board dated 18 March 2013, the applicant 
requests reconsideration that her bad conduct discharge be 
upgraded based on a recent background report.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit H.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

In earlier findings, the Board determined there was insufficient 
evidence to warrant any corrective action.  After thoroughly 
reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of 
this appeal and the evidence of record, we do not believe the 
applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in the previous 
decisions.  Therefore, we do not find the additional evidence 
presented is sufficient to warrant the relief sought on that 
basis.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis upon which to recommend favorable consideration of the 
applicant’s request.

________________________________________________________________
_






THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2002-01953-3 in Executive Session on 6 June 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


Although XXXXX chaired the panel, in view of his 
unavailability, XXXXXX has agreed to sign as Acting Panel 
Chair.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit E.  Record of Proceedings, dated 13 Feb 2003, 
w/atchs.
   Exhibit G.  Addendum to Record of Proceedings, dated
               24 November 2009, w/atchs.
   Exhibit H.  Letter, Applicant, dated 18 March 2013, w/atchs.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2002-01953-3

    Original file (BC-2002-01953-3.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s appeal and the rationale of the earlier decisions by the Board, see Exhibit E and G, respectively. Exhibit G. Addendum to Record of Proceedings, dated 24 November 2009, w/atchs. Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 March 2013, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00130-2

    Original file (BC-2012-00130-2.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS HEARING DESIRED: NO DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00130 COUNSEL: NONE IN THE MATTER OF: (FMR SERVICE MEMBER) (APPLICANT) ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former-spouse’s records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for former-spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). However, the service member has since provided a notarized...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1991 | BC 1991 01020 5

    Original file (BC 1991 01020 5.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-1991-01020 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. On 14 February 1953, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Air Force Regulation (AFR) 39-18, Special Court-Martial Order 91, with a BCD. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00052-2

    Original file (BC-2009-00052-2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G. The applicant submitted a letter, with attachments, requesting reconsideration of his case. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03156 ADDENDUM

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on 5 June 2012. After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in our previous decision. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00608A

    Original file (BC-2006-00608A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding her request, and the rationale for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F. On 27 Nov 06 and 2 May 07, the applicant’s requests for reconsideration of her application were denied because she did not provide evidence meeting the criteria for reconsideration. See Exhibits G and H. On 1 May 08, the applicant provided additional documentation through her Congressional...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02611-2

    Original file (BC-2010-02611-2.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 30 November 2012, the applicant’s counsel submitted a request for reconsideration based on their submission of affidavits from the applicant’s former husband (member) and his current spouse agreeing to the requested relief and voluntarily relinquishing all rights and/or benefits under the member’s pre- and post-retirement...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2005-00960-3

    Original file (BC-2005-00960-3.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation and the rationale for the earlier decisions by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F and the Addendum to the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H. In a DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States, dated 27 April 2007, the applicant requests reconsideration. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit I. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01973-2

    Original file (BC-2007-01973-2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Panel Chair AFBCMR 1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700 Joint Base...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 01973 2

    Original file (BC 2007 01973 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Panel Chair AFBCMR 1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700 Joint Base...